Controversial Alabama Immigration Law Withstands Preemption Challenge

On September 28th, United States District Court Judge Sharon Lovelace Blackburn upheld the most controversial sections of the immigration law enacted in Alabama earlier this year in a lawsuit brought by the US Department of Justice challenging the law on preemption grounds. Alabama HB56, was signed into law in June after Republicans won a supermajority in the State Legislature in the 2010 mid-term elections. It was challenged by the Obama administration as well as by civil rights groups. Both have vowed to appeal the ruling as it contradicts prior rulings by other federal courts that have considered similar laws in other states.

Judge Blackburn’s ruling upholds provisions requiring police officers to request immigration documentation from anyone they suspect to be undocumented, and that all Alabama public schools from Grades K to 12 receive confirmation of immigration status from parents of all children attending. The ruling also upholds provisions of the law that allow contracts to become void if entered into with an undocumented immigrant, and that criminalize the act of an undocumented immigrant’s application for a driver’s license or a license plate. The law also includes criminal penalties for individuals who give rides to undocumented immigrants, and enables private citizens to report law enforcement officers and offices which do not enforce the law properly

The Judge’s ruling was more lenient regarding business owners and employers, as sections were blocked that penalize individuals who hire undocumented immigrants or encourage them to stay in-state to work. The judge issued a preliminary injunction against several sections of the law, agreeing with the government’s case that they may be pre-empted federal law. She blocked a broad provision that outlawed the harboring or transporting of undocumented immigrants and another that barred undocumented immigrants from enrolling in or attending public universities.

Alabama Governor Robert Bentley, applauded the ruling, stating that the jurisdiction now has “the strongest immigration law in the country.” Advocates on behalf of immigrants, such as America’s Voice Education Fund, are on the other hand indignant about the ruling, stating that it is the federal government’s job to determine immigration law and policy, and that the states only make matters worse by enforcing rules and laws that play to American’s fears rather than their strengths and best interests between one another.

For more information on this or any other immigration topic, please contact Valentine Brown at

About vbimmigration

For More Information Call 215 979 1840 Immigration Law Partner at Duane Morris, LLP. 20 years representing companies and individuals in all aspects of immigration law. H-1Bs, L-1s, TNs, PERM, Global immigration; compliance; working visas; green cards; consular processing citizenship and deportation.
This entry was posted in E-Verify, Immigration News. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s